CXP-1162: docs: add Databricks match_baton_id formats to developer ID tables - #576
Open
luisina-santos wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
baton-databricks sets RawId to its resource ID, which for groups is a compound path rather than the native Databricks group ID. Document the per-resource-type values and warn about the bare-ID mismatch in the Terraform guides. Refs CXP-1162 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
Author
|
@mindymo docs updates needs to be merged when v0.1.16 reaches stable channel |
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Since v0.1.16, baton-databricks sets a
RawIdon every resource, so objects pre-created withmatch_baton_idmerge on sync. But the developer ID tables left out Databricks. Databricks also breaks their "use the native ID" rule: a group's value is a compound resource ID, not the Databricks group ID.developer/recipes-id: adds a Databricks row, a key point, and a newDatabricks resource IDssubsection with the value for each resource type (group, workspace, workspace role, account role, user, service principal)developer/debugging: adds Databricks group and workspace rows to the "Check what ID the connector uses" table, with a link to the full tabledeveloper/syncing: adds a Databricks row to the RawId tabledeveloper/terraform-best-practicesanddeveloper/terraform: add a warning after the Okta examples. For Databricks groups, a bare group ID inmatch_baton_idproduces a duplicate resource instead of a mergeI checked the values against the baton-databricks source (
pkg/connector/groups.go,roles.go,workspaces.go,raw_id_test.go). The account-group, workspace and workspace-role merges were measured on a sandbox tenant. The workspace-scoped group format (workspace/<deployment-name>/group/<group-id>) comes from the source and was not tested live.Linear: CXP-1162
🤖 Generated with Claude Code