Selection Resources and References descriptions are very similar

[ahouseholder]

The two descriptions are very alike. Can we rephrase them, so that the difference of these fields is show more clearly?

Maybe, clearly state that the resources are about the decision points by stating: decision_point_resources.

And that references are about the decision context by renaming it to decision_context or basis_for_decision or decision_base_references

Originally posted by @tschmidtb51 in #821 (comment)

[sei-vsarvepalli]

SSVC/data/schema/v2/Decision_Point_Value_Selection-2-0-0.schema.json

Line 51 in afecc43

"resources": {

VS

SSVC/data/schema/v2/Decision_Point_Value_Selection-2-0-0.schema.json

Line 76 in afecc43

"references": {

[ahouseholder]

Resolved by #833

[tschmidtb51]

Thank you for renaming resources to decision_point_resources 😄

[tschmidtb51]

Was there a specific reason not to rename references?

(Just wondering - but if we want to change it, we need to do that before Wednesday 13:00 CEST).

[sei-vsarvepalli]

Was there a specific reason not to rename references?

(Just wondering - but if we want to change it, we need to do that before Wednesday 13:00 CEST).

My decision was based on this the references is itself broader, it made sense to leave it as it is.