Skip to content

Possible underestimated pass@3 results #45

Open

Description

@aorwall

I have evaluated your predictions using my Docker based swe-bench evaluator. I achieve 26% on pass@3 compared to the 22% you reported. It might be worthwhile to review the logs for the failed benchmarks to see if your agent can actually achieve even better results :D

You find the logs and report here

And here's a sheet I use to compare the results.

Activity

  1. changed the title [-]Possible Underestimated pass@3 Results[/-] [+]Possible underestimated pass@3 results[/+] on May 12, 2024
  2. zhiyufan commented on May 13, 2024

    @zhiyufan
    Contributor

    Thank you for this detailed report!
    I quickly went through the comparison sheet you shared and noticed that there are many opposite acr-2/3 results in the two evaluation environments. Maybe you mistakenly mixed up the acr-2/3 results?

  3. aorwall commented on May 13, 2024

    @aorwall
    Author

    You're right. Good catch. That explains why it looked like some of the benchmark instances failed in my benchmark. Now it covers all the cases you resolved.

  4. yuntongzhang commented on May 13, 2024

    @yuntongzhang
    Contributor

    This looks great! The dockerized evaluation environment would be very useful for obtaining consistent evaluation results. We will also try out your docker-based evaluation on our machines :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions