Skip to content

Community archetypes for documentation and engagement #155

Open

Description

@jmunroe

Context

2i2c has identified three kinds of groups that we provide managed hubs:

  1. Distributed research hubs
  2. Educational hubs
  3. Single-group research hubs

Reviewing our existing and upcoming hubs here are some communities that could serve as "archetypes" for these different hub models:

  1. Distributed research hub
  • e.g., Pangeo (as an existing hub)
  • e.g., Alabama Water Institute (as an upcoming hub)
  1. Education hub
  • e.g., U Toronto
  1. Single-group research hub
  • e.g., MEOM SWOT at U Grenoble

I am planning to curate and prepare documentation for these specific hubs that could be reused for all of our hub communites. These particular choice of example hubs is representative of our different kinds of groups and I am open to suggestions if there are communities that would be a better examples (in replacement or addition) to the ones identifed above.

Proposal

No response

Updates and actions

No response

Activity

  1. self-assigned this
    on Jul 18, 2022
  2. damianavila commented on Jul 19, 2022

    @damianavila
    Contributor

    I think this is a great idea! Having these hub personas well defined is super important not only from the community perspective but also at the time to come up with a complex (and probably composable) billing model suited for each of those ones.

  3. moved this from In progress to Ready to work in DEPRECATED Engineering and Product Backlogon Jul 20, 2022
  4. moved this from Ready to work to Needs Shaping / Refinement in DEPRECATED Engineering and Product Backlogon Sep 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Fields

Area of Work

None yet

Projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions