diff --git a/docs/planning/idea-inbox.md b/docs/planning/idea-inbox.md
index a7833a0..2e9aa02 100644
--- a/docs/planning/idea-inbox.md
+++ b/docs/planning/idea-inbox.md
@@ -48,5 +48,5 @@ write `Not recorded` rather than guessing.
 
 | Idea | Raised by | Date added | Context or source | Possible area |
 |---|---|---|---|---|
-| **Default project workspace and starting material.** Plan how a new Scient user's basic desktop project workspace should be set up when the app creates and works with local files and folders. | Not recorded | 2026-07-12 | The evaluated skills-system direction now lives in the [Scient Skills System](../product/skills-system.md). Remaining questions include built-in starter guidance, standard places for articles and PDFs, other common project material, what Scient creates automatically, what remains visible versus app-managed, and how non-skill starting material works when opening an existing folder. | Product planning, project-format architecture, onboarding, and product design |
 | **Visual literature map.** Add an interactive, Obsidian-style graph view of the literature sources in a Scient project. Sources would appear as nodes, with inspectable relationships such as citations, shared topics, project links, or researcher-created connections. The view should help researchers explore clusters, identify central or isolated sources, review gaps, filter the collection, and open each source in its normal detail view. | Yishai | 2026-07-18 | Spoken idea. The initial scope should focus on sources already imported into the project; broader scholarly-network discovery and the exact relationship types remain open questions. | Source-library product planning, literature-review UX, design, and future source-relationship architecture |
+| **Future Scient memory architecture.** Plan Scient's complete memory architecture as a dedicated future product and architecture discovery before selecting schemas, databases, or synchronization machinery. | Not recorded | 2026-07-18 | Questions about project records, conversations, candidate memory scopes, provenance, SQLite, Git, user-selected cloud folders, recovery, privacy, retention, and future Scient cloud sync arose during the first-slice T3 source review. The scopes and boundaries remain unaccepted, and no storage choice is authorized. Detailed candidate scopes and open questions are preserved in [draft PR #23](https://github.com/ScientFactory/Scient/pull/23). | Product planning, future memory architecture, agent runtime, project format, security, provenance, synchronization, and product design |